Skip to content
TREQ 40x40, 80x40, 120x40 and 160x40 aluminium profile sizes

TREQ profile sizes explained: 40x40, 80x40, 120x40 and 160x40 in practice

TREQ profile sizes explained: 40x40, 80x40, 120x40 and 160x40 in practice

If you’re researching TREQ profile sizes explained, you’re probably trying to answer one simple question: will this rig stay rigid, feel adjustable, and support future upgrades without turning into a messy project?

Aluminium profile rigs (often called “8020 rigs”) are popular because they let you move everything: wheel height, wheel distance, pedal angle, pedal height, seat position, monitor position, and accessory placement. But not every profile rig delivers the same real-world experience.

Profile size is not just about strength

People talk about profile size like it’s a “bigger is better” contest. In reality, profile size affects three things you will notice every day:

  • Stiffness under wheel torque and pedal force
  • Adjustment range (how far you can move hardware without weird brackets)
  • Build cleanliness (space for routing and accessory mounting)

What each profile size feels like in practice

Profile size Typical role What you feel When it makes sense
40×40 Entry profile class Lighter rigs, good starter builds If you run lighter wheels/pedals and want low cost
80×40 Universal sweet spot Handles most DD + load cell setups Most people’s “buy once” tier
120×40 Extra headroom More stiffness + more adjustment range Great for clean builds, heavy peripherals and future upgrades
160×40 Flagship class Maximum stiffness and modularity Motion, high torque, heavy builds, long-term ‘endgame’ rigs

Using TREQ rigs as examples

TREQ’s lineup makes the profile-size concept easy to understand:

  • Entry-level rigs sit closer to the 40×40 / lighter 8020 idea (think “get started and upgrade later”).
  • TREQ One represents the classic 80×40 “do it all” category.
  • TREQ CXX is a 120×40 based approach if you want extra headroom and a clean look.
  • TREQ Ace moves into 160×40 flagship territory for maximum stiffness and modularity.

The SIMGASM tier match

SIMGASM mirrors this logic in a straightforward way:

Decision rule that works for most people

  • Controller or gear-driven wheel today: start entry level, plan the upgrade.
  • Load cell + mid torque DD: 80×40 is the safe bet.
  • High torque, heavy pedals, tactile, or motion: 120×40 or 160×40.

Continue reading

More TREQ guides

What actually creates flex in a profile rig

Flex is rarely “the profile size alone”. It’s usually the combination of:

  • Lever length: long uprights amplify movement at the wheel.
  • Connection style: small brackets vs larger plates, and how well they are tightened.
  • Pedal leverage: high-force brakes reveal movement quickly.

This is why a well-designed 80×40 rig can outperform a poorly assembled 120×40 build.

FAQ

  • Is bigger profile always better?
    Bigger profiles add stiffness and adjustment range, but they also add cost and footprint. Choose the smallest size that meets your upgrade plan.
  • What matters more: profile size or wheel mount design?
    Both matter. A strong wheel mount on a smaller rig can outperform a weak wheel mount on a bigger frame.
  • Will 80×40 handle direct drive?
    In many cases yes, especially at moderate torque, but high torque and heavy peripherals may benefit from 120×40 or 160×40.
  • Why do people go 160×40?
    For motion readiness, extreme rigidity, and maximum modularity over years of upgrades.
  • What’s the biggest benefit of profile rigs?
    You can change ergonomics and layout without replacing the whole cockpit.

Build Your Ultimate Setup

Take a guided path to your ideal simulator with personalization options at every step.

Compare products

{"one"=>"Select 2 or 3 items to compare", "other"=>"{{ count }} of 3 items selected"}

Select first item to compare

Select second item to compare

Select third item to compare

Compare